Thursday, November 6, 2008

GENDER ISSUES IN SUSTAINABLE ENERGY CONSUMPTION

GENDER ISSUES IN SUSTAINABLE ENERGY CONSUMPTION

OBJECTIVE

· To know the awareness level regarding energy consumption among the public through survey.

· Energy meets women’s practical, productive and strategic needs.

· In the energy crisis women and children are the most affected.

TARGET AUDIENCE

Women (both working women and house wives).

METHODOLOGY

Survey

TOOLS USED FOR DATA COLLECTION

Questionnaire

SELECTION OF SAMPLES

Strategic sampling

SAMPLE SIZE

100

QUESTIONNAIRE

PERSONAL DETAILS

  1. Name :
  2. No. of members in the family :

S.No.

Relationship

Age

Occupation

INTERVIEW

  1. Do you know anything about electricity shortage or power crisis?

a) Yes b) No

2. From which medium you came to know about it?

a) TV b) Radio c) Newspapers d) Internet

3. What do you think will happen to power crisis in future?

a) More electricity will be available.

b) Limited electricity will be available

c) Others _______________________

4. What kind of electronic equipments do you have at home?

a) TV b) Fridge c) AC d) Grinder e) Mixer f) Microwave oven

g) Water heater h) Hair drier i) others

8. Which stove do you use in your house?

a) LPG gas stove b) Kerosene stove

9. Do you know anything about biogas?

a) Yes b) No

10. Do you have electric stove in your house?

a) Yes b) No

11. How many members in your family have mobile phones?

a) 2 b) 3 c) 4 d) All e) None

12. Who use mobile phones more in your house?

a) Men b) Women c) Elders 4) Children 5) None 6) All

13. Who used to pay the electricity bill in your house?

a) Husband/wife b) Elders c) Teenagers/daughter/son d) Servant

14. Over the last three months, is there any change in the electricity bill?

a) Raised continuously b) No difference c) became low

15. Who is more concerned about electricity consumption in your family?

a) Husband/wife b) Elders c) Children d) None

16. Do you know about power saving guide for electrical appliances?

a) Yes b) No

18. Have you bought any electrical appliance based on the power saving guide?

a) Yes b) No

19. How many hours do you have power cuts daily?

a) <2 style=""> b) >2 hrs

20. Who are facing maximum difficulties during the power cuts?

a) Male b) Female c) Children

21. What are the problems faced?

__________________________________________________

22. Do you have water scarcity at home?

a) Yes b) No

23. Who will usually waste water in your house?

a) Men b) Women c) Elders d) Children e) None f) All

24. Which mode of travel do you prefer for traveling small distances?

a) Walk b) Vehicle

24. How do you wash your clothes?

a) Servant b) Self c) Washing machine

25. How often do you use washing machine?

a) Daily b) Alternate days c) Once in a while

26. In your opinion, who/which will use more water?

a) Servant b) Self c) Washing machine

Saturday, August 23, 2008

Cuddalore is another Bhopal

Cuddalore is another Bhopal

Cuddalore is another Bhopal in the making of SIPCOT, Cuddalore, and highlight the threats of pollution-intensive industrialization facing Cuddalorthe SIPCOT industrial estate -- is seriously affected by pollution from more than 19 chemical industries. The State Human Rights Commission and the Indian People’s Tribunal on Environment and Human Rights have observed that SIPCOT residents are already overburdened with pollution. They have recommended against setting up any more chemical industries in the area

.

Despite massive public protest and the recommendations of various expert agencies, the Tamilnadu Government is planning to intensify pollution in and around SIPCOT. In the pipeline, are the following proposals:

  1. Chemplast PVC factory and marine terminal, and desalination plant, Semmankuppam and Chitrapettai
  2. 4000MW coal-fired thermal power plant, Naduthittu
  3. A mega textile park, Periyapattu
  4. A 6 million tones per annum petrochemical refinery by Nagarjuna, Thyagavelli
  5. Effluents pumped into sea from Tiruppur textile dyeing units
  6. Effluents pumped into sea from Ambur-Vaniyambadi leather tanneries
  7. A shipbuilding yard

Poison in the air

Poisonous gases released into the air by some chemical units in the SIPCOT industrial estate in Cuddalore, Tamil Nadu, continue to endanger the lives and livelihoods of people in a number of villages in the absence of government action.

At the SIPCOT industrial estate in Cuddalore. Gases released by chemical units have severely affected the air quality in the area. ." Other Hazardous Air Pollutants found in SIPCOT air:

1,3-dimethyl benzene
Ethyl Benzene
Tribromometane
Naphthalene
p-xylene
Styrene

VILLAGES in the industrial area on the outskirts of Cuddalore town in Tamil Nadu are increasingly being identified more by pungent smells than their names - smells of rotten cabbage, burnt rubber, rotten egg, neem, detergent, human excreta, decomposing bodies, mosquito coils, rotting bones, decaying chikoo fruit, and nail polish. The smells come from toxic chemical compounds that are manufactured or released as effluents by the 18 companies in the industrial area and which have been damaging the environment and the health of more than 20,000 people in about 20 villages. Cuddalore, 25 km from Pondicherry, is part of an intricate network of estuaries, deltas, creeks, lagoons, salt-marshes, sanctuaries and coral reefs that serve as a natural breeding ground and habitat for various species of fish. This unique topography shelters and feeds lakhs of people through fishery and agriculture. Fringed by the sea and with fertile soil, Cuddalore is an idyllic 27 sq km town of verdant fields of sugarcane, groundnut and rice, and casuarina and coconut plantations.

In 1982, the State Industries Promotion Corporation of Tamil Nadu (SIPCOT) set up of a 200-hectare industrial estate 8 km away from Cuddalore town, on the Cuddalore-Chidambaram coastal road. Financial incentives, uninterrupted power and water supply and an excellent communication network saw companies, big and small, setting up units to manufacture pesticides, pharmaceuticals, chemicals, plastics, dyes and textiles. The success of the first phase prompted SIPCOT to set up a second, 80-ha facility with, among others, a large polyvinylchloride (PVC) manufacturing and processing unit. Now 18 units operate in the SIPCOT estate, and four just outside it. One unit in the estate was closed on May 18 after an accident.

Ever since SIPCOT set up the estate, life for the thousands of people of Pachaiyankuppam, Thaikal, Thiyagavelli, Eachangadu, Kudikadu, Karaikadu, Sonnanchavadi, Sangolikuppam, Nellikupam and Pondiyankuppam villages has been one of dealing with hazardous effluents such as methanol, acetaldehyde, formic acid, ammonia, toulene, nitrobenzene, methyl mercaptan and vinyl acetate monomer. This chemical concoction has impaired seriously their lives and livelihood systems. The people complain of constant irritation in the eyes, nausea, acute dermatitis, muscle fatigue, and pink and frothy sputum, and have been diagnosed with changed reproductive health effects, narcosis and cyanosis. There has also been a substantial contamination of the water table, the air and the soil, leading to lowered farm production and dwindling fish catch. Many studies have reported that the industrial estate has altered the riverine ecosystem, even poisoned the river, affecting farm output and killing fish. This has affected the livelihoods of farmers and fisherfolk.

Groundwater situation

Potable groundwater, which was earlier available at less than 30 feet (nine metres), is now difficult to find even at 800 feet (244 m). The industrial units used borewells to tap groundwater for all their water requirements, amounting to more than 20 million litres a day. The local people, who depend on groundwater, say that the National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development (NABARD) issued a circular last year advising banks to stop granting loans for agricultural pumpsets in order to stop the sinking of more borewells. But the industries continue to sink borewells, the people say. NEERI reports that the results are a conservative estimate as most of the industries were not operating to capacity on the days of sampling. "If all the industries in the study area function to the full capacity, it may be expected that concentrations of pollutants will increase three folds," NEERI says.

List of Chemicals Detected with Highest Levels Recorded

Name of Chemical

Highest Level (microgram/m3)

Location

Times above safe levels

Benzene

31.174

Asian Paints

125

Carbon tetrachloride

72

Tagros Chemicals

553

Chloroform

74

Shasun

881

Methylene Chloride

133

Tanfac

32.5

Trichloroethylene

24

Aurobindo Chemicals

21.8

Salinity

In 1994, the Asian Development Bank (ADB) warned of saline water intrusion in the area: "Since the aquifer in Cuddalore is close to the coast, there is a danger of sea water intrusion if there is severe depletion of its quantity without adequate recharge. Present data show the saline intrusion has already happened in the Cuddalore area." In fact, in Sangolikuppam village alone about 300 handpumps are not usable because of saline water ingress.

Chemical pollution

People report odorous (sewer, metal or aromatic substances), coloured water (yellow, red or black) that has an oily or burning taste - all indicating the presence of chemicals.

A 2003 report on Environment and Human Rights by the Indian People's Tribunal states that "all villages within or in the immediate vicinity of SIPCOT suffer from serious groundwater pollution. Handpumps between Thaikalthonithurai and Semmankuppam have been abandoned. A handpump behind one of the factories pumped out black water that smelled of sewageTetrachloroethylene
Toluene
Carbon disulphide

Dwindling fish catch

The fish catch has dropped by nearly 80 per cent and fish varieties have disappeared. This is largely attributed to the contamination of the river where fish-kills are apparently common. According to the local people, they no longer catch bottom-dwelling fish such as kezhangan, udupullati and irunpalathi.

Chemical park increases risk of cancer in cuddalore
People living in and around a special economic zone in Cuddalore are "2,000 times more" likely to be affected by cancer than the normal population, says a report prepared for the Tamil Nadu Pollution Control Board. In a normal sample population, cancer occurs in one person in a million. But in and around the State Industries Promotion Corp of Tamil Nadu known as SIPCOT industrial park nearly 300 km south of Chennai, two in every thousand are likely to have cancer, say anti-pollution campaigners.

The Nagpur-based National Environmental Engineering Research Institute (NEERI) has prepared the report.

The study confirms the decades-old complaints by local residents that pollution from the chemical factories in the park is worst at night, especially in the village of Eachangadu.

The NEERI submitted the report in August 2007 to TNPCB without any public information. It came to light after an RTI plea by the local environment watchdog, Community Environment Monitoring (CEM).

The TNPCB commissioned the NEERI study in response to a 2004 report "Gas Trouble", released by the SIPCOT Area Community Environmental Monitors, highlighting the presence of at least 22 toxic gases in the air over SIPCOT.


Tsunami & Pichavaram mangroves

Tsunami & Pichavaram mangroves

Pichavaram mangrove wetland, occupying an area of about 1400 ha, is located about 280 km down south of Chennai, in the Cuddalore District. Fishing and farming communities belonging to 17 hamlets utilize the resources of the Pichavaram mangrove wetlands of Cuddalore District. Out of these 17 hamlets, 6 hamlets are under physical coverage of the mangrove wetlands, 5 hamlets are located on or near to the open beach and not protected by mangroves. Remaining 6 hamlets are far away from mangrove forest. There was no damage to 6 hamlets that are physically protected by the mangroves but hamlets located on or near to the beach have been totally devasted.

Tsunami & Mangroves: Field visit was made to the Pichavaram mangroves and no major damage was noticed; a few trees located very close to the sea uprooted. All the hydrogen sulphide loaded soil and debris deposited on the forest floor are washed away, which will have positive impact on mangroves. Pichavaram mangrove forest protected hamlets namely, T.S.Pettai, Vadakku Pichavaram, Therkku Pichavaram, Meenavar Colony, MGR Nagar and Kalaingar Nagar against the fury of tsunami. Total families in these hamlets are about 1228 and total population is about 6191. These hamlets are located between 100 m to 1000 m from mangroves. In these hamlets seawater has not entered into the village and there is no loss of property.

However, 4 women belonging to MGR Nagar, who were fishing nearby the sea were washed away and died. It is seen that mangrove trees in rows located close to the sea got uprooted due to the impact of the tsunami and beyond that there is no damage. It seems mangrove forest reduced the impact of the tsunami by two ways: a) velocity of the tsunami water greatly reduced after it entered into the mangroves due to friction created by thick mangrove forest and b) volume of water reaching a point is greatly reduced since tsunami water, after entering into the mangroves, is distributed to all the canals and creeks that are present all over the mangroves. A number of fishers who were fishing in the nearby the sea but moved into mangrove water after seeing huge wave of about 10 to 15 feet coming to the beach experienced these. One of the fishers said, "we saved the mangroves by restoring them and it saved our life and property by protecting us" of about 10 to 15 feet coming to the beach experienced these. One of the fishers said, "we saved the mangroves by restoring them and it saved our life and property by protecting us"

Damage to mangrove resource user hamlets Some of the fishing families belonging to hamlets such as Muzhukkuthurai, MGR Thittu, Chinnavaikal, Pillumedu, Kannagi Nagar and Mudasalodai fish in the mangrove water seasonally and a few families annually. Since these hamlets are located either near to mangroves, thereby not under the physical cover of the mangroves or on the beach they are devasted by the tsunami. Some of the hamlets such as MGR Thittu, Chinnavaikal, Pillumedu and Kannagi Nagar are located about 50m from the high tide line. These hamlets are first developed as temporary settlements. Impact The following are the impact of the tsunami in the above-mentioned hamlets.

  1. Loss of lives
  2. Loss of and damage to fishing gears and crafts
  3. Loss of thatched houses with mud walls and huts
  4. Damage to houses
  5. Loss of all livestocks
  6. Loss of all household items, including cooking vessels
  7. Loss of personal properties including jewels and hard cash
  8. Loss of textbooks and other items of school students
  9. Total salinization of lands and water resources, including drinking water.

Loss of lives in these villages is given in Table 1 and a few are reported missing. Loss of crafts and gears (which can not be repaired) are given in Table 2: Table 1 Loss of lives in the hamlets affected by tsunami in the Pichavaram region

Hamlet

Total family

Total population

Casualty

Adult

Children

Muzhukkuthurai

155

512

4 (M 4; F 4)

3 (M 1; F 2)

MGR Thittu

173

856

24 (M 6; F 18)

26 (M 17; F 9)

Chinnavaikal

50

211

5 (M 1; F 4)

6 (M 1; F 5)

Pillumedu

45

120

5 (M 1; F 4)

7 (M 1; F 6)

Kannagi Nagar

10

30

2 (M 1; F 1)

0

Total

433

1729

40

42

Table 2: Fishing crafts lost due to tsunami

Hamlet

Catamaran

Catamaran with engine

Dugout canoes/thoni

Fiberglass boats

Muzhukkuthurai

10

27

0

10

MGR Thittu

0

0

0

43

Chinnavaikal

0

0

10

31

Pillumedu

0

0

20

0

Kannagi Nagar

0

0

5

0

Total

10

27

35

84

1 Catamaran is about Rs.10000/-, Catamaran with engines, Rs.30000/-, Thoni 30000/- and Fiberglass boats Rs.80000/-. Each fisher lost fishing net worth of about Rs.15000 to 25000/-.

What we have done? Rice and groceries worth of Rs.5000/- was provided to affected families on the next day of tsunami and medicine worth of Rs.5000/- is provided to the Primary Health Centre of Killai as per the physician's request. We have also arranged medical camps with the help of team of AMDA, Japan. Biocouncil, Pondicherry provided rice, oil and groceries to about 15 families. Apart from these, 4 other oraganizations, who came with relief materials and approached our help for distribution, provided assistance.

  • A proposal for relief and rehabilitation for Muzhukkuthurai village has been prepared and sent to ICEF.
  • NDTV team was taken to mangroves and a 4 minute programme to show how mangrove can play a vital role prevent this kind of disaster was shot

Pichavaram mangroves

Tsunami & Pichavaram mangroves

Pichavaram mangrove wetland, occupying an area of about 1400 ha, is located about 280 km down south of Chennai, in the Cuddalore District. Fishing and farming communities belonging to 17 hamlets utilize the resources of the Pichavaram mangrove wetlands of Cuddalore District. Out of these 17 hamlets, 6 hamlets are under physical coverage of the mangrove wetlands, 5 hamlets are located on or near to the open beach and not protected by mangroves. Remaining 6 hamlets are far away from mangrove forest. There was no damage to 6 hamlets that are physically protected by the mangroves but hamlets located on or near to the beach have been totally devasted.


Tsunami & Mangroves: Field visit was made to the Pichavaram mangroves and no major damage was noticed; a few trees located very close to the sea uprooted. All the hydrogen sulphide loaded soil and debris deposited on the forest floor are washed away, which will have positive impact on mangroves. Pichavaram mangrove forest protected hamlets namely, T.S.Pettai, Vadakku Pichavaram, Therkku Pichavaram, Meenavar Colony, MGR Nagar and Kalaingar Nagar against the fury of tsunami. Total families in these hamlets are about 1228 and total population is about 6191. These hamlets are located between 100 m to 1000 m from mangroves. In these hamlets seawater has not entered into the village and there is no loss of property.

However, 4 women belonging to MGR Nagar, who were fishing nearby the sea were washed away and died. It is seen that mangrove trees in rows located close to the sea got uprooted due to the impact of the tsunami and beyond that there is no damage. It seems mangrove forest reduced the impact of the tsunami by two ways: a) velocity of the tsunami water greatly reduced after it entered into the mangroves due to friction created by thick mangrove forest and b) volume of water reaching a point is greatly reduced since tsunami water, after entering into the mangroves, is distributed to all the canals and creeks that are present all over the mangroves. A number of fishers who were fishing in the nearby the sea but moved into mangrove water after seeing huge wave of about 10 to 15 feet coming to the beach experienced these. One of the fishers said, "we saved the mangroves by restoring them and it saved our life and property by protecting us" of about 10 to 15 feet coming to the beach experienced these. One of the fishers said, "we saved the mangroves by restoring them and it saved our life and property by protecting us"


Damage to mangrove resource user hamlets Some of the fishing families belonging to hamlets such as Muzhukkuthurai, MGR Thittu, Chinnavaikal, Pillumedu, Kannagi Nagar and Mudasalodai fish in the mangrove water seasonally and a few families annually. Since these hamlets are located either near to mangroves, thereby not under the physical cover of the mangroves or on the beach they are devasted by the tsunami. Some of the hamlets such as MGR Thittu, Chinnavaikal, Pillumedu and Kannagi Nagar are located about 50m from the high tide line. These hamlets are first developed as temporary settlements. Impact The following are the impact of the tsunami in the above-mentioned hamlets.

  1. Loss of lives
  2. Loss of and damage to fishing gears and crafts
  3. Loss of thatched houses with mud walls and huts
  4. Damage to houses
  5. Loss of all livestocks
  6. Loss of all household items, including cooking vessels
  7. Loss of personal properties including jewels and hard cash
  8. Loss of textbooks and other items of school students
  9. Total salinization of lands and water resources, including drinking water.

Loss of lives in these villages is given in Table 1 and a few are reported missing. Loss of crafts and gears (which can not be repaired) are given in Table 2: Table 1 Loss of lives in the hamlets affected by tsunami in the Pichavaram region

Hamlet

Total family

Total population

Casualty

Adult

Children

Muzhukkuthurai

155

512

4 (M 4; F 4)

3 (M 1; F 2)

MGR Thittu

173

856

24 (M 6; F 18)

26 (M 17; F 9)

Chinnavaikal

50

211

5 (M 1; F 4)

6 (M 1; F 5)

Pillumedu

45

120

5 (M 1; F 4)

7 (M 1; F 6)

Kannagi Nagar

10

30

2 (M 1; F 1)

0

Total

433

1729

40

42

Table 2: Fishing crafts lost due to tsunami

Hamlet

Catamaran

Catamaran with engine

Dugout canoes/thoni

Fiberglass boats

Muzhukkuthurai

10

27

0

10

MGR Thittu

0

0

0

43

Chinnavaikal

0

0

10

31

Pillumedu

0

0

20

0

Kannagi Nagar

0

0

5

0

Total

10

27

35

84

1 Catamaran is about Rs.10000/-, Catamaran with engines, Rs.30000/-, Thoni 30000/- and Fiberglass boats Rs.80000/-. Each fisher lost fishing net worth of about Rs.15000 to 25000/-.



Cuddalore is another Bhopal

Cuddalore is another Bhopal

Cuddalore is another Bhopal in the making of SIPCOT, Cuddalore, and highlight the threats of pollution-intensive industrialization facing Cuddalorthe SIPCOT industrial estate -- is seriously affected by pollution from more than 19 chemical industries. The State Human Rights Commission and the Indian People’s Tribunal on Environment and Human Rights have observed that SIPCOT residents are already overburdened with pollution. They have recommended against setting up any more chemical industries in the area

.

Despite massive public protest and the recommendations of various expert agencies, the Tamilnadu Government is planning to intensify pollution in and around SIPCOT. In the pipeline, are the following proposals:

  1. Chemplast PVC factory and marine terminal, and desalination plant, Semmankuppam and Chitrapettai
  2. 4000MW coal-fired thermal power plant, Naduthittu
  3. A mega textile park, Periyapattu
  4. A 6 million tones per annum petrochemical refinery by Nagarjuna, Thyagavelli
  5. Effluents pumped into sea from Tiruppur textile dyeing units
  6. Effluents pumped into sea from Ambur-Vaniyambadi leather tanneries
  7. A shipbuilding yard

Poison in the air

Poisonous gases released into the air by some chemical units in the SIPCOT industrial estate in Cuddalore, Tamil Nadu, continue to endanger the lives and livelihoods of people in a number of villages in the absence of government action.

At the SIPCOT industrial estate in Cuddalore. Gases released by chemical units have severely affected the air quality in the area. ." Other Hazardous Air Pollutants found in SIPCOT air:

1,3-dimethyl benzene
Ethyl Benzene
Tribromometane
Naphthalene
p-xylene
Styrene

VILLAGES in the industrial area on the outskirts of Cuddalore town in Tamil Nadu are increasingly being identified more by pungent smells than their names - smells of rotten cabbage, burnt rubber, rotten egg, neem, detergent, human excreta, decomposing bodies, mosquito coils, rotting bones, decaying chikoo fruit, and nail polish. The smells come from toxic chemical compounds that are manufactured or released as effluents by the 18 companies in the industrial area and which have been damaging the environment and the health of more than 20,000 people in about 20 villages. Cuddalore, 25 km from Pondicherry, is part of an intricate network of estuaries, deltas, creeks, lagoons, salt-marshes, sanctuaries and coral reefs that serve as a natural breeding ground and habitat for various species of fish. This unique topography shelters and feeds lakhs of people through fishery and agriculture. Fringed by the sea and with fertile soil, Cuddalore is an idyllic 27 sq km town of verdant fields of sugarcane, groundnut and rice, and casuarina and coconut plantations.

In 1982, the State Industries Promotion Corporation of Tamil Nadu (SIPCOT) set up of a 200-hectare industrial estate 8 km away from Cuddalore town, on the Cuddalore-Chidambaram coastal road. Financial incentives, uninterrupted power and water supply and an excellent communication network saw companies, big and small, setting up units to manufacture pesticides, pharmaceuticals, chemicals, plastics, dyes and textiles. The success of the first phase prompted SIPCOT to set up a second, 80-ha facility with, among others, a large polyvinylchloride (PVC) manufacturing and processing unit. Now 18 units operate in the SIPCOT estate, and four just outside it. One unit in the estate was closed on May 18 after an accident.

Ever since SIPCOT set up the estate, life for the thousands of people of Pachaiyankuppam, Thaikal, Thiyagavelli, Eachangadu, Kudikadu, Karaikadu, Sonnanchavadi, Sangolikuppam, Nellikupam and Pondiyankuppam villages has been one of dealing with hazardous effluents such as methanol, acetaldehyde, formic acid, ammonia, toulene, nitrobenzene, methyl mercaptan and vinyl acetate monomer. This chemical concoction has impaired seriously their lives and livelihood systems. The people complain of constant irritation in the eyes, nausea, acute dermatitis, muscle fatigue, and pink and frothy sputum, and have been diagnosed with changed reproductive health effects, narcosis and cyanosis. There has also been a substantial contamination of the water table, the air and the soil, leading to lowered farm production and dwindling fish catch. Many studies have reported that the industrial estate has altered the riverine ecosystem, even poisoned the river, affecting farm output and killing fish. This has affected the livelihoods of farmers and fisherfolk.

Groundwater situation

Potable groundwater, which was earlier available at less than 30 feet (nine metres), is now difficult to find even at 800 feet (244 m). The industrial units used borewells to tap groundwater for all their water requirements, amounting to more than 20 million litres a day. The local people, who depend on groundwater, say that the National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development (NABARD) issued a circular last year advising banks to stop granting loans for agricultural pumpsets in order to stop the sinking of more borewells. But the industries continue to sink borewells, the people say. NEERI reports that the results are a conservative estimate as most of the industries were not operating to capacity on the days of sampling. "If all the industries in the study area function to the full capacity, it may be expected that concentrations of pollutants will increase three folds," NEERI says.

List of Chemicals Detected with Highest Levels Recorded

Name of Chemical

Highest Level (microgram/m3)

Location

Times above safe levels

Benzene

31.174

Asian Paints

125

Carbon tetrachloride

72

Tagros Chemicals

553

Chloroform

74

Shasun

881

Methylene Chloride

133

Tanfac

32.5

Trichloroethylene

24

Aurobindo Chemicals

21.8

Salinity

In 1994, the Asian Development Bank (ADB) warned of saline water intrusion in the area: "Since the aquifer in Cuddalore is close to the coast, there is a danger of sea water intrusion if there is severe depletion of its quantity without adequate recharge. Present data show the saline intrusion has already happened in the Cuddalore area." In fact, in Sangolikuppam village alone about 300 handpumps are not usable because of saline water ingress.

Chemical pollution

People report odorous (sewer, metal or aromatic substances), coloured water (yellow, red or black) that has an oily or burning taste - all indicating the presence of chemicals.

A 2003 report on Environment and Human Rights by the Indian People's Tribunal states that "all villages within or in the immediate vicinity of SIPCOT suffer from serious groundwater pollution. Handpumps between Thaikalthonithurai and Semmankuppam have been abandoned. A handpump behind one of the factories pumped out black water that smelled of sewageTetrachloroethylene
Toluene
Carbon disulphide

Dwindling fish catch

The fish catch has dropped by nearly 80 per cent and fish varieties have disappeared. This is largely attributed to the contamination of the river where fish-kills are apparently common. According to the local people, they no longer catch bottom-dwelling fish such as kezhangan, udupullati and irunpalathi.

Chemical park increases risk of cancer in cuddalore
People living in and around a special economic zone in Cuddalore are "2,000 times more" likely to be affected by cancer than the normal population, says a report prepared for the Tamil Nadu Pollution Control Board. In a normal sample population, cancer occurs in one person in a million. But in and around the State Industries Promotion Corp of Tamil Nadu known as SIPCOT industrial park nearly 300 km south of Chennai, two in every thousand are likely to have cancer, say anti-pollution campaigners.

The Nagpur-based National Environmental Engineering Research Institute (NEERI) has prepared the report.

The study confirms the decades-old complaints by local residents that pollution from the chemical factories in the park is worst at night, especially in the village of Eachangadu.

The NEERI submitted the report in August 2007 to TNPCB without any public information. It came to light after an RTI plea by the local environment watchdog, Community Environment Monitoring (CEM).

The TNPCB commissioned the NEERI study in response to a 2004 report "Gas Trouble", released by the SIPCOT Area Community Environmental Monitors, highlighting the presence of at least 22 toxic gases in the air over SIPCOT.


Friday, August 22, 2008

TSUNAMI: Cuddalore District

TSUNAMI

Cuddalore is a large industrial town. It has a large number of industries that employ much of the city’s population. The district of Cuddalore was heavily damaged by the tsunami waves. Several fishing hamlets simply disappeared. M.G.R Thittu, Pillaimedu,Kannagi Nagar, Chinnavoyi are completely washed away.
At several places in Cuddalore district, huge waves burst water pipelines disrupting water supply, and in other places the seawater incursion made both surface and ground water saline and importable. Fishermen, prawn/crab and fish seedling farm owners, fish transport owners, ice-manufacturing units, all sufferd loss of income. Horticulture activities in Cuddalore were also affected.

Construction of houses at Pudukuppam, Cuddalore

12 July 2005 — Pudukkuppam, Cuddalore District, Tamil Nadu

The Tamil Nadu Government had allotted three acres of land for the rehabilitation of tsunami victims in Pudukuppam, Cuddalore. Ashram is building a total of 88 houses in this village and another 14 of which are in the properties of the recipients. This village witnessed the highest number deaths in the Cuddalore district. 101 lives were lost from 350 families at Pudukuppam. In addition to the houses, the colony will also have a community center and day-care centre.

Construction is progressing well since the foundation stone for the houses was laid on 20 May. Isolated column footing work for all the houses is complete. Concrete work for 72 of the houses in the site is complete. More than 400 people are working at the construction site. Bricks necessary for the construction are made at the site. A team of workers produce as many as 2,500 bricks a day. The site also houses machines for carpentry and steel work.

Work starts as early as six in the morning. The workers take a break at 11 a.m. since the temperature during daytime is very high. The temperature may even rise up to 45 degree celsius. After tea, the work resumes at four in the evening again and goes on till 12 at night.

Food for the workers is cooked and served at the Ashram kitchen situated at the construction site. Using hand pumps, pure water for drinking and construction is taken from a depth of three meters.


UNESCO mangrove programme

The UNESCO Mangrove Programme

The success or value of any project, be it the construction of the pyramids of ancient Egypt or the nursing of a baby, can only be gauged after as long a time as possible; the pyramids have endured centuries of weathering and man's destructive activities, the health of the grown up human being is greatly the result of infant care.

The productivity of any ecosystem is taken for granted, until when the system begins to deteriorate and perceptive people sound the alarm. This happened with the mangroves; as early as the seventies UNESCO sounded the alarm. It took some ten years of persuasion to convince funding agencies that mangroves far from being wastelands, provide directly and indirectly for the livelihood of millions of people of the coastal area of the tropical belt. Obvious and hidden services and benefits provided by the mangrove ecosystem had always been taken for granted by the local people, but the same mangrove swamps had been hotly condemned as hazards to navigation and unhealthy places for humans, by the early European navigators of the age of discoveries and others after them.

Implementation of the UNESCO/United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) Mangrove projects started in January 1982 and were officially concluded in December 1990. The 538 pages long Report of the first project was released in March 1987 and it honoured its title: "Status and Management of the Mangroves of Asia and the Pacific". The Final Report of the second project entitled "Research and its application to mangrove ecosystems management in Asia and the Pacific" was released on 15 October 1991. The second project banking on the achievements of the first, had enlarged scope and greater geographic representation.

During implementation of the projects world wide awareness was elicited on the important ecological role that mangroves play, especially the hidden benefits they offer free of cost to mankind, though these benefits are difficult to quantify. UNESCO worked with National Mangrove Committees, institutions and national scientists, professionals, decision makers, health officers and, above all, the coastal dwellers themselves.

Noted scientists specialized in particular fields of knowledge related to mangroves, such as microbiology, nutrient cycling, palynology, hydrology, remote sensing, social studies and others were also invited to offer lectures, give training for field work, contribute papers, offer advice and discuss mangrove matters with other professionals, decision makers, the media and, above all, the villagers themselves. With time a multidisciplinary integrated approach for a better understanding of the structure and function of mangrove ecosystems for sustainable use and management gradually took shape. This approach was tested by a two year long programme of research and field work at Ranong, Thailand.

One of the most noticeable successes of UNESCO's Asia and Pacific Mangrove Project is the interest that they elicited in the mangroves of the world. Country reports, specific studies of mangrove areas and assessment of mangrove resources, experiments on use and management appropriate to each site, seminars, symposia, lectures, active involvement of national mangrove committees, improved legislation, national and international training courses have mushroomed over the past ten years or so, world-wide. Awareness of the ecological cost of destructive uses has to some extent been successful in restraining harmful practices; for instance in the island of Bali, Indonesia, conversion of mangroves to shrimp ponds is now forbidden by law. In Thailand, the establishment of an "International Coastal and Marine Biosphere Reserve" which includes the mangroves of Ranong, has been discussed and approved under the Regional Participation Programme of UNESCO and with the invaluable aid and support of the Royal Forest Department and other Thai bodies, such as Fisheries and Agriculture Departments, Local Government, Wildlife Sanctuaries and World Heritage Areas.

As knowledge of the significant role that mangrove ecosystems play in the tropical coastal zone grew world-wide, it also became clear that mangroves are marginal ecosystems, vulnerable to sudden or drastic changes in the environment. Mangroves do not recover spontaneously after the impact of natural or manmade catastrophic events such as cyclones or total felling of the mangrove forests.

Mangrove ecosystems throughout the world have in common only the fact that they are tidally inundated by brackish or saline waters at regular intervals that may vary from twice daily to seasonal flooding in monsoonal areas. Practically all other ecological and socio-economic factors vary from place to place, and socio-economics can be regarded as a measure of human ecology. Only few species of higher plants have over the course of geologic time, become adapted to demanding conditions such as ample fluctuations of water and soil temperature and salinity, of air humidity and temperature; thus, because it is the forest that creates the mangrove ecosystem and the forest is constituted by only a few species at any site, the system as a whole is marginal and fragile, vulnerable to sudden or drastic changes. On the other hand, developers saw only the negative aspects of those dreaded swamps; total clearing, or turning the mangroves over to agriculture, for instance sugar cane after building sea walls to cut out encroachment by sea water, was seen as improvement, without realising that after felling the forest, degradation sets in, quickly followed by desertification, productivity of the waters decreases, and fish and shrimp larvae and fry find no nursery facilities for their growth.

Mangroves totally converted into fish and shrimp ponds
Photo Dr. M. Vannucci
Pakistan: A thriving nursery in the desert. The Avicennia seedling beds appear to be dead, but they are alive and growing; their colour is due to the reflection of sunlight from the silvery underside of the leaves. Photo: Dr M. Vannucci

The second project set itself the difficult task for proving the point that over and above the obvious benefits, the hidden benefits are substantial and may in the long run be even greater than those that could be obtained by "development". Benefits are sustainable over decades and centuries, as experience shows in many places of south and south-east Asia, if the swamp is left undisturbed or if it is appropriately managed according to local environmental determinants. Man-made engineering structures and aquacultural high energy input farms on the other hand, have a short life of a few years at most. By the time shrimp farms stop being economically viable, the irreversible damage caused by indiscriminate felling of forests for ponds or timber extraction becomes visible, it grows at an alarming rate and remedial action is at best time and money consuming, if not impossible.

During the second project the activities of the first project were continued; in addition a unique project was launched that became known as the "Ranong project", or, the "Ranong experiment", from the place in Thailand where it was located. It was entitled: "Integrated multidisciplinary survey and research programme of the Ranong mangrove ecosystem". An area near Ranong city was designated by the National Research Council of Thailand to be the experimental area, with the purpose of developing recommendations for rational sustainable use and management of mangroves. We also aimed at developing a model that would enable decision makers to estimate the potential returns of a well managed mangrove ecosystem including forestry, captive and capture fisheries and other human activities. We hoped that this would help compare returns from the natural system with returns sought from development of the same area.

Needless to say, we could not, as desired, develop a model that could become a world model for the use and management of mangroves. Obviously well developed, highly productive forests growing in suitable environmental conditions would produce much more than others growing under stress in extreme environmental conditions of temperature, dryness, lack of sediment input, pollution or other stressful conditions. Scrubby mangroves might produce nothing more than some fuel wood, some coastal stabilisation or some fodder for cattle and camels, shelter for fish and crustaceans or even only some of this in a reduced quantity, sufficient or not to satisfy the needs of local men and animals. Nevertheless, because mangroves grow where nothing else grows, they are always useful, even where they cannot be managed as productive forests. The enrichment of brackish and coastal waters provided by the mangrove vegetation may be substantial and should not be overlooked.

How did the UNESCO programme work? Through regular introductory and specialised training courses and workshops on topics as varied and important as palynology, remote sensing, microbiology, nutrient cycling, human health and others as applicable to the understanding of structure and function of mangrove ecosystems. The UNESCO Mangrove Programme started with 8 countries, and by the time it was concluded in 1990, there was a well knit network of 22 countries. The programme contributed efficiently to develop a binding sense of responsibility among people interested in mangroves in one way or another.

It worked by publishing reports, manuals, nine specialized "Occasional Papers", detailed reports, totalling over 40 publications and a book for the general public. The second project worked essentially along the same lines except that much effort was concentrated in the 2-year long Ranong project. This was possible thanks to the foresight of Professor Sanga Sabhasri of Thailand, of the logistic support given by the National Research Council of Thailand and the financial support offered by Thailand, of about US$700 000, the Royal Forest Department and Chulalongkom University also participated actively in the programme. Senior and junior scientists from Thailand and the other countries of the project worked along with renowned scientists from the international scientific community who freely participated in such an enterprise. Two special reports, two of the "Occasional Papers", the "Manual for Fish Eggs and Larvae from Mangrove Waters" were the outcome of the Ranong Project. The Reports are a short concise 16pp "Executive Report" and a longer more detailed 183pp "Final Report". In addition, scientific papers based on the Ranong work are being published in scientific journals.

There were many hidden benefits from the project; they are enduring benefits from which we are still reaping fruits, as could be witnessed recently at Hat Yai where about 150 persons gathered to discuss the most important theme of the whole exercise: the "Significance of mangroves for coastal people", under the aegis of the International Society for Mangrove Ecosystems, the Prince of Sangkla University, the National Research Council of Thailand, the Royal Forest Department of Thailand, and the Non-Governmental Organizations Assistance Division, Economic Co-operation Bureau, Ministry of Foreign Affairs.

During the second project, in Ranong, over a period of two years specialists in relevant disciplines of science and management worked together for mutual training and understanding. As we could witness in Hat Yai, the best way of doing research in the mangroves - the interdisciplinary holistic approach - is not only still alive, but is becoming stronger and stronger.

Malaysia: Spontaneous regrowth on a prograding beach.
Photo: Dr. M. Vannucci

At present, two books on mangroves, one with over 30 papers from Latin America, the Caribbean and Africa, and another giving line drawings and description of the development stages of over 60 species of mangrove fish, are under press and will be released soon by UNESCO. The International Society for Mangrove Ecosystems publishes a Technical Series, a series of Proceedings of professional meetings, and tries to keep the series of Mangrove Occasional Papers alive in spite of financial constraints.

During the UNESCO projects, the greatest and most valuable contribution came from each and every participant, and others involved, school teachers in villages, university professors, students, scientists, researchers, media persons and many mangrove dwellers are all responsible for the success of the project. Time is the best test of quality and value; this was obvious at the seminar at Hat Yai (20 August 1996) and in the enthusiasm of all present, many of them "old timers" of the "good old days". It was especially rewarding to see a large number of young people actively engaged in mangrove matters, many having worked as volunteers for replanting an area selected for the purpose by the Centre for Mangroves at Satun, near Hat Yai, and many more participants belong to local or national non-governmental organizations.

But the UNESCO project was not without hazards, one of our best lecturers, field worker and devoted companion and colleague, Dr. G. Thanikaimoni fell victim of international terrorism while on a flight from India to New York, to discuss with other palynologists the work that he was doing for the posthumously published Palynology Manual. He left behind him a first class work that is a benchmark for the identification of pollen from species of mangrove plants of ages past, and many fond memories full of respect and appreciation.

One of the most important achievements of the UNESCO projects was that it made sure that the progress accrued should not end abruptly when finances were drained: on 23rd August 1990, the International Society for Mangrove Ecosystems was formally inaugurated in Japan thanks to the unremitting efforts of a few persons participating in UNESCO's project. At present the International Society for Mangrove Ecosystems has about 700 individual and institutional members and great financial problems for the simple reason that there is so much to be done.

Maybe this is the greatest success of this story: faithful to its raison d'ĂȘtre, UNESCO identified a major problem, worked towards understanding the root causes of the problem, proposed remedial actions and stimulated willing people, institutions and governments to endorse the action needed to face the perilous situation of the tropical coastal zone. Recommendations and management plans continue to be improved upon, refined, adapted to specific places, ecological and socio-economic conditions; this we call eco-eco-use and management practices, meaning ecologically sound and economically rewarding use and management of mangroves. But, in a changing world and under intensive environmental exploitation and degradation, we know that there is no reason for complacency, it will always be an upward task and we must keep at it with no pause. The International Society for Mangrove Ecosystems follows on UNESCO's footsteps, faces the challenges and requests the help of all willing people, institutions and funding agencies.

The International Society for Mangrove Ecosystems is an international non-governmental organization and many of its members come from countries that do not have mangroves, a sure sign that people are now aware of the ecological significance of mangroves world-wide. The Okinawa Prefectural Government, where the International Society for Mangrove Ecosystems is based, covers the running costs of the Secretariat and has sponsored several activities at home and abroad. Also several Government and non governmental organizations of Japan have sponsored many of the Society's activities and projects in many countries. To quote but one now coming to an end, in Pakistan, was a project to combat coastal desertification due to over exploitation, reduction of Indus River water flow and pollution that ran over a period of three years and has successfully reforested an area of 1 800 ha. of coastal land. The project was funded by the Ministry of Post & Telecommunications of Japan with well over US$200 000 since 1994. Most of the projects that the International Society for Mangrove Ecosystems runs in the field, have, the value of experiments that can be applied elsewhere in the world in addition to their intrinsic value for the improvement of local ecological and socio-economic conditions of the coastal people, the International Society for Mangrove Ecosystems continues UNESCO's tradition of publishing technical papers for the benefit of professionals and of holding workshops for discussion of specific aspects of rational use and management. Thanks to financial support from JICA (Japan International Co-operation Agency), the International Society for Mangrove Ecosystems yearly holds two-month long training courses at the Okinawa International Centre. Japan Fund for Global Environment contributed about US$200 000 since 1993 for slides and video programmes to enhance public awareness of the ecological and socio-economic role of mangrove ecosystems. None of this, and much more however, would be possible without the understanding and support in kind and space, and above all in time, expertise, experience and collaboration of so many persons from so many countries; Thailand, Malaysia, Indonesia, Vietnam and other Asian countries, Fiji and Pacific Ocean nations, Senegal and other African states, Brazil and other Latin American and Caribbean countries, as well as Australia, France, the United Kingdom and other European countries, and so many others who individually and collectively are contributing towards the greening of degraded tropical coastal areas.

Projects come to an end either because the planned task has been completed or because funds are exhausted. Projects in the biological and ecological field cannot come to a close , because all living systems are in a continuous irretrievable process of evolution, often difficult to predict in its outcome and best analysed periodically as time progresses. For this reason the International Society for Mangrove Ecosystems was created and opportunities such as the Hat Yai Conference are sought for exchange of information, for updating techniques and to redress what may have gone astray.

Our reward comes in glory when a smile of mutual understanding shines on the faces of villagers of all ages who now agree, against traditional habits, to fence camels off natural regrowth areas and for purposes of rotation forestry. Local people are the most thorough co-workers, happier even than ourselves with whatever success we reap in the field. UNESCO was born and nurtured to take care of the people of the world through education, science and culture: the mangrove programme is an important brick contributing to the strength and durability of the edifice.


The story of the UNESCO Mangrove Programme was contributed by Dr. M. Vannucci of the International Society for Mangrove Ecosystems and former UNESCO staff member at the UNESCO New Delhi Office.